We initiated on Intelsat this week with a Buy rating and $54 price target (+131%), based on our view that the C-Band auction will see much higher values than most investors realize (see initiation report HERE). One of the most common questions we have received is around what precedent transactions for similar spectrum in Europe tell us about the price the C-Band might fetch in the US. We follow up with some quick thoughts on the most recent European precedent, the 3.5GHz auction in Germany, in this brief note. Bottom line: the German auction value was very supportive of the US seeing $50BN in auction proceeds (the crux of our Intelsat Buy thesis and $54 target).
Baseline: German Auction Comp Suggests $40-67BN In US C-Band Auction Proceeds
Germany auctioned the 3400-3700MHz frequencies earlier this year for a total of $4.8BN (4.2BN EUR), or $0.19 / MHz-POP. Across the most recent comparable auctions700MHz and 900MHz sold in a 2015 German auction for $0.24 / MHz-POP, vs. the US 600MHz which sold for $0.91 / MHz-POP (4x the German comp) in 2017. 1.8GHz sold in the 2015 German auction for $0.33 / MHz-POP, compared to US AWS-3 which sold for $2.66 / MHz-POP (8x the German comp) in 2015. , US spectrum has sold for 4-8x the price of German spectrum on a per MHz-POP basis, implying a C-Band auction prices of at least $0.73 / MHz-POP. With 180-300MHz being made available in the US C-Band auction, this suggests anywhere from $40-67BN for a US C-Band auction (and potentially twice this amount). In addition, we think that there are several reasons why the US should see higher prices than the German auction.
Reason #1: More Bidders In US
The first reason we think the US might see higher prices than the German comp is the sheer number of bidders. The German and US markets both feature 3 MNOs, as well as a fourth entrant who is seeking to become an MNO (1&1/Drillisch in Germany; DISH in the US). Unlike the German market however, the US also has large well-capitalized cable companies with growing wireless ambitionsSee slides 31-32 in our Intelsat initiation HERE; in Germany, cable assets are almost entirely owned by one of the MNOs (Vodafone, following the Liberty transaction). All else equal, this should drive incremental bidding tension in the US.
Reason #2: Fewer Competing Uses Of Capital For US Bidders
The German 3.5GHz auction was conducted along with an auction of 2.1GHz spectrum. If bidders were balance-sheet or budget-constrained, bidding on the 2.1GHz spectrum was a drain on resourcesNotably the 2.1GHz auctioned was licensed nationwide (unlike the 2.5GHz the FCC plans to auction next year) with full-power (unlike the CBRS band the FCC plans to auction next year). . Altogether, the 2.1GHz auction raised $2.4BN while the 3.5GHz auction raised $4.2BN in Germany; had the bidders been able to allocate all of their resources to the 3.5GHz auction, they might have spent as much as $6.6BN for the spectrum. At this level of spend, the German 3.5GHz would have sold for $0.30 / MHz-POP, implying $63-105BN in spend for the US C-Band auction.
Reason #3: Onerous German Regulations Unlikely In US
The 3.5GHz licenses auctioned in Germany came with significant regulations for incumbent MNOs that are unlikely to be present for the US C-Band. The spectrum came attached with aggressive buildout deadlines, requiring 98% HH coverage with 100Mbps in just 3 years’ time, among various other requirements (see more details on slide 10 HERE). In addition, and perhaps more importantly, the incumbents who won spectrum at auction had to offer roaming to new entrants, with the German regulator involved in rate-setting. We don’t think either of these rather onerous conditions is likely to come to fruition in the US, given a long-standing history of free market spectrum rights.
Full 12-month historical recommendation changes are available on request
Reports produced by New Street Research LLP. 52 Cornhill, London EC3V 3PD Tel: +44 20 7375 9111.
New Street Research LLP is authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority and is registered in the United States with the Securities and Exchange Commission as a foreign investment adviser.
Regulatory Disclosures: This research is directed only at persons classified as Professional Clients under the rules of the Financial Conduct Authority (‘FCA’), and must not be re-distributed to Retail Clients as defined in the rules of the FCA.
This research is for our clients only. It is based on current public information which we consider reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete, and it should not be relied on as such. We seek to update our research as appropriate, but various regulations may prevent us from doing so. Most of our reports are published at irregular intervals as appropriate in the analyst's judgment. This research is not an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation would be illegal. It does not constitute a personal recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual clients.
All our research reports are disseminated and available to all clients simultaneously through electronic publication to our website.
New Street Research LLC is neither a registered investment advisor nor a broker/dealer. Subscribers and/or readers are advised that the information contained in this report is not to be construed or relied upon as investment, tax planning, accounting and/or legal advice, nor is it to be construed in any way as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or any other form of investment. All opinions, analyses and information contained herein is based upon sources believed to be reliable and is written in good faith, but no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied, is made herein concerning any investment, tax, accounting and/or legal matter or the accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness and/or appropriateness of any of the information contained herein. Subscribers and/or readers are further advised that the Company does not necessarily update the information and/or opinions set forth in this and/or any subsequent version of this report. Readers are urged to consult with their own independent professional advisors with respect to any matter herein. All information contained herein and/or this website should be independently verified.
All research is issued under the regulatory oversight of New Street Research LLP.
© Copyright 2021 New Street Research LLP
No part of this material may be copied, photocopied or duplicated in any form by any means or redistributed without the prior written consent of New Street Research LLP.