What’s New: The C-Band Alliance released a new plan to re-allocate 300MHz of the C-Band for terrestrial use (LINK). Other aspects of the CBA proposal, such as auction structure, were largely left unchanged, and we expect further filings to address some of the technical details around the transition. The new plan for 300MHz is a positive step for the CBA as it further solidifies its position at the FCC by making a “significant amount” of spectrum available (one of FCC Chairman Ajit Pai’s four principles as detailed HERE). We remain buyers of Intelsat on the deeply under-valued C-Band opportunity (as laid out HERE).
Details: The plan released by the CBA would clear 300MHz of the C-Band, with 280MHz coming available for mobile terrestrial use. The first 120MHz (100MHz net of guard-band) would be made available in major markets within 18 months after an auction, while the remaining 180MHz would be made available throughout the continental US within 36 months. Specifically, the plan calls for launching eight satellites (similar to the number of satellites needed to clear 200MHz), and using technologies such as advanced modulation, single format transport, and HEVC in order to improve the spectral efficiency of satellite video delivery. The CBA has committed to bearing the costs of upgrading certain media customers, and now estimates clearing costs of $2.5-3.5BN (a touch above our estimate of $2.5BN – see slide 52 HERE). The CBA also suggested that they will make additional filings on the exact timeline, cost schedule, and other details for the transition process; they did not offer any changes to their FUEL auction proposal.
Thesis impact: Our bullish view on Intelsat rests (1) on the amount of proceeds a C-Band auction will generate in an auction (see slides 12-50 HERE), and (2) the ability of the CBA (and Intelsat) to capture the majority of that value (see slides 51-75 HERE). The new proposal should help the CBA capture the value associated with a C-Band auction; one of the common criticisms of the prior CBA proposal was the relatively small amount of spectrum made available for terrestrial use (180MHz), which looked especially paltry when compared to alternative proposals to clear 350MHz. With the new proposal to clear 280MHz, we think this key point of criticism falls away, making it easier for the FCC ultimately to adopt the CBA plan.
Full 12-month historical recommendation changes are available on request
Reports produced by New Street Research LLP. 52 Cornhill, London EC3V 3PD Tel: +44 20 7375 9111.
New Street Research LLP is authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority and is registered in the United States with the Securities and Exchange Commission as a foreign investment adviser.
Regulatory Disclosures: This research is directed only at persons classified as Professional Clients under the rules of the Financial Conduct Authority (‘FCA’), and must not be re-distributed to Retail Clients as defined in the rules of the FCA.
This research is for our clients only. It is based on current public information which we consider reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete, and it should not be relied on as such. We seek to update our research as appropriate, but various regulations may prevent us from doing so. Most of our reports are published at irregular intervals as appropriate in the analyst's judgment. This research is not an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation would be illegal. It does not constitute a personal recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual clients.
All our research reports are disseminated and available to all clients simultaneously through electronic publication to our website.
New Street Research LLC is neither a registered investment advisor nor a broker/dealer. Subscribers and/or readers are advised that the information contained in this report is not to be construed or relied upon as investment, tax planning, accounting and/or legal advice, nor is it to be construed in any way as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or any other form of investment. All opinions, analyses and information contained herein is based upon sources believed to be reliable and is written in good faith, but no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied, is made herein concerning any investment, tax, accounting and/or legal matter or the accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness and/or appropriateness of any of the information contained herein. Subscribers and/or readers are further advised that the Company does not necessarily update the information and/or opinions set forth in this and/or any subsequent version of this report. Readers are urged to consult with their own independent professional advisors with respect to any matter herein. All information contained herein and/or this website should be independently verified.
All research is issued under the regulatory oversight of New Street Research LLP.
© Copyright 2021 New Street Research LLP
No part of this material may be copied, photocopied or duplicated in any form by any means or redistributed without the prior written consent of New Street Research LLP.