Quick Thoughts On Congressional Risk To Intelsat

In our Intelsat (Buy; TP: $54; +131%) initiation report from earlier this week (LINK), we highlighted the nature of the Congressional risk to the CBA and its members. While our view has been that an actual law is unlikely, Congressional headline risk remains high. The latest “encouragement” from Senator Kennedy (R-LA) in a draft bill markup is in-line with this view: it has no legal impact on the process, but indicates that some in Congress are still looking closely at the matter. We expect continued headline risk going forward, but Congressional action remains unlikely.

Language Is Non-Binding, Softer Than Expected

The most important thing to note from the actual language of Sen. Kennedy’s “encouragement” (see below) is that it is non-binding, even if the bill to which it is attached becomes law. The language is also a bit softer than expected, given Sen. Kennedy’s prior comments on the C-Band[1]“Luxembourg shouldn’t reap huge profits at the expense of Louisianans” : it simply notes concern with the lack of FCC and public input, lack of guarantee of proceeds to the US government, and encourages an FCC auction that is “fair, open, and transparent”. It’s not entirely clear that a $10BN contribution of proceeds to the US government (our base case as laid out on Slide 54 HERE) via a traditional FCC auction process would not satisfy these requirements.

“[On C-Band:] The Committee encourages the FCC to prioritize resources toward exploring opportunities for spectrum to help accelerate the deployment of 5G to rural communities. The mid-band spectrum, specifically the C-band, is particularly well-suited for 5G services. However, the Committee remains concerned by proposals that entail limited FCC oversight and public input, and contain no guarantee that taxpayers and the U.S. Treasury benefit from revenues generated by the sale of 5G licenses. The airwaves are a public resource, and the Federal Government has a responsibility to exercise appropriate oversight of its allocation. Therefore, the Committee encourages the FCC to conduct a public auction of the C-band spectrum that is fair, open, and transparent”

Congressional Interest In Seemingly Free Money Remains High, But Don’t Expect A Law

Given the amount of money involved, we would expect to see more headlines in the coming months from House Democrats, and potentially a handful of other Republicans like Sen. Kennedy, on this issue. However, it’s also clear that the CBA is now willing to make a contribution to the government, which we think would total $10BN, a significant sum; in addition, the CBA proposal has benefits for the national strategic interest as it relates to faster 5G deployment, and has the support from major political players like Verizon, AT&T, and the broadcasters (which has been apparent at the FCC, if not the Hill). Given these crosswinds, we think actual Congressional action in the form of a law remains unlikely, though Congressional signaling could have an impact on the FCC’s positioning.

Full 12-month historical recommendation changes are available on request

Reports produced by New Street Research LLP. 52 Cornhill, London EC3V 3PD Tel: +44 20 7375 9111.

New Street Research LLP is authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority and is registered in the United States with the Securities and Exchange Commission as a foreign investment adviser.

Regulatory Disclosures: This research is directed only at persons classified as Professional Clients under the rules of the Financial Conduct Authority (‘FCA’), and must not be re-distributed to Retail Clients as defined in the rules of the FCA.

This research is for our clients only. It is based on current public information which we consider reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete, and it should not be relied on as such. We seek to update our research as appropriate, but various regulations may prevent us from doing so. Most of our reports are published at irregular intervals as appropriate in the analyst's judgment. This research is not an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation would be illegal. It does not constitute a personal recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual clients.

All our research reports are disseminated and available to all clients simultaneously through electronic publication to our website.

New Street Research LLC is neither a registered investment advisor nor a broker/dealer. Subscribers and/or readers are advised that the information contained in this report is not to be construed or relied upon as investment, tax planning, accounting and/or legal advice, nor is it to be construed in any way as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or any other form of investment. All opinions, analyses and information contained herein is based upon sources believed to be reliable and is written in good faith, but no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied, is made herein concerning any investment, tax, accounting and/or legal matter or the accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness and/or appropriateness of any of the information contained herein. Subscribers and/or readers are further advised that the Company does not necessarily update the information and/or opinions set forth in this and/or any subsequent version of this report. Readers are urged to consult with their own independent professional advisors with respect to any matter herein. All information contained herein and/or this website should be independently verified.

All research is issued under the regulatory oversight of New Street Research LLP.

© Copyright 2021 New Street Research LLP

No part of this material may be copied, photocopied or duplicated in any form by any means or redistributed without the prior written consent of New Street Research LLP.

1. “Luxembourg shouldn’t reap huge profits at the expense of Louisianans”