Tomorrow, the Senate will hold a sub-committee hearing to conduct oversight of the FCC Spectrum Auctions Program. The hearing will be presided over by Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA), who has been in opposition to any C-Band re-allocation process that would see the C-Band Alliance capture significant proceeds. FCC Chairman Ajit Pai will be a witness, and this may well be the first time we get more insight into his thinking on the C-Band re-allocation process (the two other witnesses are from deficit hawk lobbying groups). In this brief note, we lay out what we would read as positive and negative signs for the CBA and Intelsat (see our recent bullish initiation HERE).
Chairman Pai has provided very few details on his view of the re-allocation process, only noting that action would be taken in the fall (i.e. at the November or December meeting). Other Republicans on the Commission, most notably Commissioner O’Rielly, have been far more explicit in their support of the CBA’s proposal for a private auction (LINK). We suspect that Pai is supportive of the CBA’s proposal, given the record (see slide 75 of our initiation HERE) and support from other Republicans.
Senator Kennedy has been an outspoken advocate against the CBA’s plan to auction the spectrum (with the vast majority of the proceeds going to its members). Recently, he included language in an appropriations bill that “encouraged” the FCC to conduct a public auction, as opposed to the CBA’s proposed private auction; such language has no actual legal impact on the FCC, as we note HERE. Thus far, Senator Kennedy has been unable to convince other Republican senators to join his cause (other Senate Republicans were reportedly upset with his bill language), though there is a risk that this will change as the debate plays out.
Key issue #1: Government cut of proceeds
The first key issue to watch for is how Chairman Pai (and the other witnesses) address the question of the government cut of proceeds. If Pai pushes for a relatively small percentage of proceeds going to Treasury, that would be a positive for the CBA; it would be even more positive if the other witnesses and Senator Kennedy agreed. It would be negative for the CBA if Pai pushed for a larger share of proceeds to go to the Treasury. Our base case for the government cut is 20%, but we think Intelsat stock could still double even if the government cut was 40% (see slide 6 HERE), as long as the auction generates our base case proceeds of $50BN.
Key issue #2: Auction rules
The second key issue to watch for is for any indication on Pai’s thinking on auction rules, specifically those rules that could hinder auction proceeds (like bidding caps). This likely won’t be a key focus of the hearing, but it is an important driver of proceeds. We have seen no indication from Pai that bidding caps would be enacted, but a more explicit statement would be positive for the CBA. Alternatively, if he suggests that bidding caps are on the table and under serious consideration, it would be negative for the CBA.
Key issue #3: Kennedy’s crusade
The final thing to watch for is any color from Senator Kennedy, and other Republican Senators, on future actions regarding the C-Band. Thus far, Senator Kennedy’s actions have brought little in the way of actual impact and have had little support from fellow Republicans. If he showed signs that this hearing would be the final step in his involvement, that would be positive for the C-Band. On the other hand, if it’s clear that other Republican members of the sub-committee are looking to place a restrictive cap on proceeds to the CBA, it would be a negative.
Full 12-month historical recommendation changes are available on request
Reports produced by New Street Research LLP. 52 Cornhill, London EC3V 3PD Tel: +44 20 7375 9111.
New Street Research LLP is authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority and is registered in the United States with the Securities and Exchange Commission as a foreign investment adviser.
Regulatory Disclosures: This research is directed only at persons classified as Professional Clients under the rules of the Financial Conduct Authority (‘FCA’), and must not be re-distributed to Retail Clients as defined in the rules of the FCA.
This research is for our clients only. It is based on current public information which we consider reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete, and it should not be relied on as such. We seek to update our research as appropriate, but various regulations may prevent us from doing so. Most of our reports are published at irregular intervals as appropriate in the analyst's judgment. This research is not an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation would be illegal. It does not constitute a personal recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual clients.
All our research reports are disseminated and available to all clients simultaneously through electronic publication to our website.
New Street Research LLC is neither a registered investment advisor nor a broker/dealer. Subscribers and/or readers are advised that the information contained in this report is not to be construed or relied upon as investment, tax planning, accounting and/or legal advice, nor is it to be construed in any way as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or any other form of investment. All opinions, analyses and information contained herein is based upon sources believed to be reliable and is written in good faith, but no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied, is made herein concerning any investment, tax, accounting and/or legal matter or the accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness and/or appropriateness of any of the information contained herein. Subscribers and/or readers are further advised that the Company does not necessarily update the information and/or opinions set forth in this and/or any subsequent version of this report. Readers are urged to consult with their own independent professional advisors with respect to any matter herein. All information contained herein and/or this website should be independently verified.
All research is issued under the regulatory oversight of New Street Research LLP.
© Copyright 2021 New Street Research LLP
No part of this material may be copied, photocopied or duplicated in any form by any means or redistributed without the prior written consent of New Street Research LLP.