Understanding the Disruptive Potential of a National 5G Network
In 2018, a National Security Council memo proposed that the government use up to 500MHz of spectrum to build a 5G network that would compete against those of the national carriers. The proposal was quickly shelved following strong opposition; however, some of the ideas contained in the memo have resurfaced recently.
A government funded network with 500MHz of spectrum would pose a profound threat to the fortunes of the national carriers. Such a network could create capacity at literally a fraction of the cost of the national carriers. Sold on the wholesale market, this cheap capacity could collapse pricing, while unlocking a wave of innovation similar to what happened when WiFi arrived on the scene.
We have always argued that the prospect of a government funded network competing against networks funded with private capital is low; however, if it came to pass, the threat posed to wireless and broadband providers is tremendous. As such, it warrants a close examination.
At our 5G Conference on November 17th, we have a number of people who are well positioned to comment on this theme, including:
- Airforce Brigadier General (Retired) Robert Spalding, who will be discussing the importance of a national 5G network in securing communications infrastructure that is competitive with China for both national security and commercial purposes (see recent WSJ article on China’s lead). General Spalding authored the NSC memo and has been an advocate for its contents.
- Declan Ganley, the CEO of Rivada, will be discussing the role that his company proposes playing in the deployment and commercialization of the government network.
- Dish has proposed an alternative strategy whereby the DoD gets access to a private network on infrastructure deployed and managed by Dish. This would allow for further scale economies, while at the same time giving the national security apparatus access to spectrum frequencies other than the C-Band frequencies the DoD controls today. Stephen Bye, Dish’s Chief Commercial Officer will be presenting at the conference.
- AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile have all opposed a federally funded 5G network; however, if a carrier were going to get a mandate to build a network for the DoD, they would likely compete against Dish for that mandate. This will no doubt come up in discussion with Andre Fuetsch, the CTO of AT&T, and Neville Ray, the CTO of T-Mobile.
This issue could have a material impact on the C-Band auction, which is set to start on December 8th.
To register for the conference and for 1x1s, please click here.
For the list of speakers, please click here.
For the agenda, please click here.
Full 12-month historical recommendation changes are available on request
Reports produced by New Street Research LLP, 18th Floor, 100 Bishopsgate, London, EC2N 4AG. Tel: +44 20 7375 9111.
New Street Research LLP is authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority and is registered in the United States with the Securities and Exchange Commission as a foreign investment adviser.
Regulatory Disclosures: This research is directed only at persons classified as Professional Clients under the rules of the Financial Conduct Authority (‘FCA’), and must not be re-distributed to Retail Clients as defined in the rules of the FCA.
This research is for our clients only. It is based on current public information which we consider reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete, and it should not be relied on as such. We seek to update our research as appropriate, but various regulations may prevent us from doing so. Most of our reports are published at irregular intervals as appropriate in the analyst's judgment. This research is not an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation would be illegal. It does not constitute a personal recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual clients.
All our research reports are disseminated and available to all clients simultaneously through electronic publication to our website.
New Street Research LLC is neither a registered investment advisor nor a broker/dealer. Subscribers and/or readers are advised that the information contained in this report is not to be construed or relied upon as investment, tax planning, accounting and/or legal advice, nor is it to be construed in any way as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or any other form of investment. All opinions, analyses and information contained herein is based upon sources believed to be reliable and is written in good faith, but no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied, is made herein concerning any investment, tax, accounting and/or legal matter or the accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness and/or appropriateness of any of the information contained herein. Subscribers and/or readers are further advised that the Company does not necessarily update the information and/or opinions set forth in this and/or any subsequent version of this report. Readers are urged to consult with their own independent professional advisors with respect to any matter herein. All information contained herein and/or this website should be independently verified.
All research is issued under the regulatory oversight of New Street Research LLP.
Copyright © New Street Research LLP
No part of this material may be copied, photocopied or duplicated in any form by any means or redistributed without the prior written consent of New Street Research LLP.