Global Towers Update – The Predictability of Divergence
As telecoms asset classes go, towers should be more predictable than most, and the recent earnings season has laid bare the diverging trends seen between some of the developed market tower companies and the emerging market ones. We are seeing positive trends emerge for tower companies in developed markets like SBAC, Inwit, and to a lesser extent Cellnex. Meanwhile, the outlook in India Bharti Infratel remains difficult and AMT remains stuck in the middle with a foot in both camps.
In developed markets like Italy and the US, despite fears that 4-3 consolidation could lead to a shrinking demand for towers, we are actually seeing the opposite play out as ongoing demand for tenancies from existing wireless carriers and new providers is driving incremental demand. Inwit has seen macro site demand accelerate in Q3 to +2% YoY – the highest rate of growth since the IPO as the network operators try to differentiate their rural performance, and tenancy growth remains supported by new demand coming from Iliad (see NOTE for more details). Cellnex is seeing similar trends with underlying tenancy growth of 4% in Spain and acceleration in Italy to +9% YoY – its strongest on record. The recent 3.5GHz auctions across Europe should only further enhance demand, as Three UK presented on this week (NOTE).
The only blip in Inwit’s results was slowing rollout of small cells, and although we have never believed management’s longer-term guidance, even our more conservative approach might now look too bullish, especially as improving propagation of the 3.5GHz band using massive-MIMO is dampening the need for any near-term small cell build out. This may be a warning sign for CCI, whose small cell strategy we have been cautious on precisely because we don’t think their fiber will generate enough small cell demand to justify their current multiple (LINK).
Similarly to Europe, we are also seeing positive tower trends in the US. Over the past two quarters, organic growth for US towers has accelerated by 100bps as all four US deploy network equipment simultaneously for the first time since 2014. Even though organic growth has taken a step function higher this year, we believe it will continue to grind higher. In the third quarter, SBAC executed the highest level of leases in their pipeline in the past four years, which means organic growth should continue to climb at least through the first half of 2019. SBAC remains our top pick within the US towers, because they stand to benefit the most from rising organic growth in the coming quarters, and have the greatest exposure to our favorite asset class – towers.
AMT has seen strong trends in the US well; however, the benefits have been dampened by their exposure to India (LINK). Dramatic consolidation is leading to weak trends in India, with Indus Towers and AMT both seeing revenue shrink over 10% annually. We expect further cut backs from Vodafone IDEA in the current quarter, but the big difference between us and most observers of the market is that we are concerned that Vodafone IDEA is not viable at current prices and with its current capital structure (LINK). We don’t think the combined entity has sufficient shareholder support for the $8-9bn equity raise required to put it on a sustainable footing. There is therefore a real risk of a gradual wind down of Vodafone IDEA with a disorderly exit. Yet Vodafone IDEA currently accounts for 36% of market colocations. A Vodafone IDEA exit would make the recent disruption in India look minor, as we estimate it would reduce Infratel’s revenue and EBITDA by 30% and 50% respectively and hence we retain our Reduce recommendation on Bharti Infratel.
Hence, for the carriers, colocating on existing towers remains a far cheaper way to roll out more capacity than building out new towers. Improving propagation is now making this possible and for the tower companies this remains a higher margin source of growth. Hence, a win-win situation for both, but for investors, the clearest way to play this is through the pure-play developed market tower companies and our favourite two would be Inwit and SBAC.
For the full weekly review and updated comp sheets, see HERE.
Full 12-month historical recommendation changes are available on request
Reports produced by New Street Research LLP, 18th Floor, 100 Bishopsgate, London, EC2N 4AG. Tel: +44 20 7375 9111.
New Street Research LLP is authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority and is registered in the United States with the Securities and Exchange Commission as a foreign investment adviser.
Regulatory Disclosures: This research is directed only at persons classified as Professional Clients under the rules of the Financial Conduct Authority (‘FCA’), and must not be re-distributed to Retail Clients as defined in the rules of the FCA.
This research is for our clients only. It is based on current public information which we consider reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete, and it should not be relied on as such. We seek to update our research as appropriate, but various regulations may prevent us from doing so. Most of our reports are published at irregular intervals as appropriate in the analyst's judgment. This research is not an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation would be illegal. It does not constitute a personal recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual clients.
All our research reports are disseminated and available to all clients simultaneously through electronic publication to our website.
New Street Research LLC is neither a registered investment advisor nor a broker/dealer. Subscribers and/or readers are advised that the information contained in this report is not to be construed or relied upon as investment, tax planning, accounting and/or legal advice, nor is it to be construed in any way as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or any other form of investment. All opinions, analyses and information contained herein is based upon sources believed to be reliable and is written in good faith, but no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied, is made herein concerning any investment, tax, accounting and/or legal matter or the accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness and/or appropriateness of any of the information contained herein. Subscribers and/or readers are further advised that the Company does not necessarily update the information and/or opinions set forth in this and/or any subsequent version of this report. Readers are urged to consult with their own independent professional advisors with respect to any matter herein. All information contained herein and/or this website should be independently verified.
All research is issued under the regulatory oversight of New Street Research LLP.
© Copyright New Street Research LLP
No part of this material may be copied, photocopied or duplicated in any form by any means or redistributed without the prior written consent of New Street Research LLP.