Infrastructure Value Should Still Emerge in European Telcos
At the end of last year, we upgraded the European telecoms sector (see LINK), and let’s be honest, over the past month it hasn’t been a great trade, as the rest of the market has ripped up with the cyclical sectors performing well (and in fact, delivering one of the best Januarys for the stock market on record), and telecoms being left in the dust. So far, YTD the European telecoms sector is down 3%, with the vast majority of that driven by Vodafone’s weak performance alone. In the near-term, this clearly leaves us a bit disappointed (about our telco call that is, rather than the wider market performance), but not yet disheartened.
We are now around half-way through the European telecoms earnings season, and although the market in general has not warmed to the sector’s Q4 earnings season, we still strongly buy into our view that the risk profile around the European telecoms sector is lower than it has been in the past, and hence with more stable, and hopefully more predictable, cashflow trajectories, we believe investors over time should be willing to pay a higher multiple for these cashflow streams. While the large caps to report so far (KPN, BT and Vodafone) have all seen their shares trade down on results days, despite all reiterating their EBITDA and cashflow guidance, investors seem to currently perceive uncertainty ahead in the next few quarters. We have actually left our free-cashflow estimates unchanged, and for detailed write-ups on why we believe this should be achievable, see here: BT, Vodafone, KPN.
In a nutshell our thesis for the sector upgrade were ROCEs had fallen to historic lows, and that this led to various conclusions: i) earnings trends for the sector were stabilising; ii) regulators would become less intrusive into the sector and might even help to provide some support, and; iii) challengers would find it harder to undercut on price. Hence, we felt the telecoms sector should be perceived more like a utility, and valued on a higher multiple accordingly. With this in mind, we would therefore dwell on two other data points that have come out in January:
1) Our tariff tracking suggests a more benign outlook. We track all tariffs in Europe monthly (see HERE), and in January, we note that the average fixed-line price in Europe is up 5% YoY – the highest we have seen at any point over the past year. In fact, if we had been writing this comment a year ago, the figure at that time was fixed price declines of -2% YoY. Hence, we do believe we are entering into an environment where we should see less aggressive ARPU declines, and given that fixed ARPU increases are amongst the highest margin source of revenue growth, this should act as a support for EBITDA and cashflow over the months ahead.
2) A rumoured approach by Brookfield along with Dutch pension funds for KPN. We wrote a detailed write-up HERE. Although this is just a press story at the moment, we believe there is likely to be truth to it, and highlights the interest that is gaining more traction about the embedded value within the telecoms sector if the infrastructure part of the asset can be revalued upwards. We have already tried to factor this in with a lower cost-of-capital for the sector, but maybe there could be further upside? We saw ATC sell fibre assets last year at 24x terminal FCF, and if that multiple can be repeated for KPN, our fair value would increase from €3.5 to €3.9/ share, implying 50% upside from the undisturbed levels. This would put KPN on 9x EBITDA, or 23x FCF – that might sound high compared to EU telcos currently trading on 6x EBITDA, but let’s not forget that only a year ago, Macquarie launched a successful takeover for TDC at 8.7x EBITDA, or 24x FCF – and they aren’t even planning to spin off the infrastructure asset.
Similar interest is gaining traction in Italy, as Enel and TI have now finally sat down to talk together, and in the UK, with a new CEO, maybe we could see a change of strategy around Openreach independence, especially if the record fibre adds growth they have seen doesn’t get captured in the share price.
If investor interest wanes further, then there is a good chance more Brookfields will appear on the horizon. We think the asset class looks appealing, especially over the time horizon they would invest on.
Full 12-month historical recommendation changes are available on request
Reports produced by New Street Research LLP, 18th Floor, 100 Bishopsgate, London, EC2M 1GT. Tel: +44 20 7375 9111.
New Street Research LLP is authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority and is registered in the United States with the Securities and Exchange Commission as a foreign investment adviser.
Regulatory Disclosures: This research is directed only at persons classified as Professional Clients under the rules of the Financial Conduct Authority (‘FCA’), and must not be re-distributed to Retail Clients as defined in the rules of the FCA.
This research is for our clients only. It is based on current public information which we consider reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete, and it should not be relied on as such. We seek to update our research as appropriate, but various regulations may prevent us from doing so. Most of our reports are published at irregular intervals as appropriate in the analyst's judgment. This research is not an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation would be illegal. It does not constitute a personal recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual clients.
All our research reports are disseminated and available to all clients simultaneously through electronic publication to our website.
New Street Research LLC is neither a registered investment advisor nor a broker/dealer. Subscribers and/or readers are advised that the information contained in this report is not to be construed or relied upon as investment, tax planning, accounting and/or legal advice, nor is it to be construed in any way as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or any other form of investment. All opinions, analyses and information contained herein is based upon sources believed to be reliable and is written in good faith, but no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied, is made herein concerning any investment, tax, accounting and/or legal matter or the accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness and/or appropriateness of any of the information contained herein. Subscribers and/or readers are further advised that the Company does not necessarily update the information and/or opinions set forth in this and/or any subsequent version of this report. Readers are urged to consult with their own independent professional advisors with respect to any matter herein. All information contained herein and/or this website should be independently verified.
All research is issued under the regulatory oversight of New Street Research LLP.
© Copyright New Street Research LLP
No part of this material may be copied, photocopied or duplicated in any form by any means or redistributed without the prior written consent of New Street Research LLP.