LatAm cable - follow the cash, not just the top line...and Malone might come knocking
We took Millicom through the East Coast at the end of last week and, in addition to significant interest in this rather unique situation, we also detected rising interest in the LatAm cable “cohort” more broadly i.e. including Megacable and Televisa (both reporting late last week) and Liberty Latin America. We tend to find interest here correlates somewhat with US cable, so a strong print from Charter provides a positive sentiment in the space and encourages investors to look for the LatAm equivalent. In this sense, it’s helpful that Millicom’s CEO, Mauricio Ramos, is on the Board of Charter.
Investor interest in these names starts with the top line appeal. Millicom’s residential cable is growing 7% y/y in Q3. This is slightly disappointing and Mauricio ran through how this should be double-digit growth in theory (dilution from Colombian copper is the cause, which will becomes less relevant over time). Megacable is growing core cable 9% y/y (although EBITDA missed) and Izzy (Televisa) is growing 10% y/y, M&A adjusted (Televisa’s earnings, in fact, so shocked the market by being in-line – after recent disappointments - that the stock was up 10% at one point on Friday). Liberty LA has yet to report but residential fixed at the former CWC operations was +11% y/y in Q2 – this could be bettered this Q.
Interest then also comes from Malone’s omnipresence. Board representation (through his deputies) in Televisa, ownership directly in Liberty LA, bid talks with Millicom (through Liberty LA) earlier this year - and rumours over the Summer of a potential minority bid for Millicom through Liberty Global (in fact, given LLA bid rumours of over $70 at the start of the year, it’s strange that a share price narrowing in on $40 at Millicom hasn’t arisen interest…or maybe it has). Malone could also consider rolling up Liberty LA into Global – is there really any point in owning two telco quotes?
It’s tempting to buy a basket of all these stocks. It wouldn’t be such a terrible idea, in fact. The issue, however, is two-fold. Firstly, both Millicom (through Telefonica wireless acquisitions) and Liberty LA (through Puerto Rico) have both levered up the balance sheets: the former to 3.25x proportionate net debt to EBITDA end-2019 and the latter to 4.5x. Any headwind to combine assets with a cash contribution has been squeezed.
Secondly, and perhaps more importantly, there are very mixed cash profiles at the stocks. Our favourite names are Millicom (certainly down here, obviously noting the 37% stock overhang, but on fundamental value – see LINK from today’s note following last week’s roadshow) and Liberty LA (see LINK for the Puerto Rico deal, which investors are generally very enthusiastic about). Millicom is close to a cash yield of 10% (and growing OpFCF by 10% y/y) whilst Liberty LA will be closing in on a 10% cash yield in a couple of years’ time (2019 is the first year of positive cash flow after a troubled genesis).
We’d contrast this with the Mexican stocks. See LINK for recent note on Malone’s potential shopping in the market. Top line doesn’t translate into strong EFCF. At Televisa it is zero in 2019 (watch capex, the definition excludes intangibles; and note all cash yields need adjusting for lease costs post-IFRS 16). At MEGA it’s a little better but translates into no better than a cash yield to equity of 3%. This is both a fundamental concern – this profile in the country doesn’t improve for a number of years - and is potentially M&A impactive. Trying to manufacture an accretive transaction given high financing costs (inflation in Mexico is higher than Brazil!) becomes that much harder.
So we’d sooner own the stocks with the better current (Millicom) and near-term (Liberty LA) cash profiles. And you never know who might come knocking. Again.
Full 12-month historical recommendation changes are available on request
Reports produced by New Street Research LLP, 18th Floor, 100 Bishopsgate, London, EC2M 1GT. Tel: +44 20 7375 9111.
New Street Research LLP is authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority and is registered in the United States with the Securities and Exchange Commission as a foreign investment adviser.
Regulatory Disclosures: This research is directed only at persons classified as Professional Clients under the rules of the Financial Conduct Authority (‘FCA’), and must not be re-distributed to Retail Clients as defined in the rules of the FCA.
This research is for our clients only. It is based on current public information which we consider reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete, and it should not be relied on as such. We seek to update our research as appropriate, but various regulations may prevent us from doing so. Most of our reports are published at irregular intervals as appropriate in the analyst's judgment. This research is not an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation would be illegal. It does not constitute a personal recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual clients.
All our research reports are disseminated and available to all clients simultaneously through electronic publication to our website.
New Street Research LLC is neither a registered investment advisor nor a broker/dealer. Subscribers and/or readers are advised that the information contained in this report is not to be construed or relied upon as investment, tax planning, accounting and/or legal advice, nor is it to be construed in any way as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or any other form of investment. All opinions, analyses and information contained herein is based upon sources believed to be reliable and is written in good faith, but no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied, is made herein concerning any investment, tax, accounting and/or legal matter or the accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness and/or appropriateness of any of the information contained herein. Subscribers and/or readers are further advised that the Company does not necessarily update the information and/or opinions set forth in this and/or any subsequent version of this report. Readers are urged to consult with their own independent professional advisors with respect to any matter herein. All information contained herein and/or this website should be independently verified.
All research is issued under the regulatory oversight of New Street Research LLP.
© Copyright New Street Research LLP
No part of this material may be copied, photocopied or duplicated in any form by any means or redistributed without the prior written consent of New Street Research LLP.