Not All (UK) Infrastructure Assets Are Alike

We tend to like global infrastructure assets. In the best case scenario, they often have captive demand and no regulation, which can lead to superior pricing power – think US towers or datacentres (see most recent report HERE). But infrastructure assets always tend to have captive demand, so even in the case of European tower infrastructure, less attractive contracts still afford investors good earnings visibility with upside optionality from infrastructure expansion (recent note on Inwit highlighting this HERE).

And then even where there is regulatory scrutiny on fixed-infrastructure assets, underpinned returns means infrastructure investors are willing to pay far higher multiples than current stock market investors, as their implied cost of capital is lower. Altice know this too and is aiming to use this to its advantage as it sells a stake in its regulatory-supported monopoly rural fibre projects (note HERE). It is also why Elliott is looking to spin off TI’s network asset which would likely be valued by investors at c.7.5x EV/ EBITDA, vs. the market multiple of 5.3x.

However, the key issue here is “captive demand”. Take that away, and the investment case on infrastructure assets becomes a whole different ball game. Just ask the Indian tower companies. Or going back to the 1980s/ 1990s, ask the original investors in CLECs, or UK cable companies.

This week we undertook a deeper dive into the UK overbuilder market (full note HERE), as this area of infrastructure deployment has been generating a significant degree of external investor interest. Goldman Sachs-backed private equity companies have bought out Cityfibre, Prudential has been investing in Gigaclear, and Soros/ Abu Dhabi have been investing in Hyperoptic. However, as our deep-dive shows, not all of these assets are alike – and in very few of these cases is the demand case clear. These new overbuilders will often be head-to-head with existing big retail brands like BT, TalkTalk, Sky and Virgin. Building a network is one thing. Getting customers to switch, especially in a low churn market like broadband, is another.

We believe that where there is an inherent cost advantage to deploy, ie in urban multi-dwelling units, for businesses like Hyperoptic, they only need to get 10% take-up to cover their costs and low deployment costs will also make the retail opportunity attractive. However, in the wider suburban sprawl of the UK which represents three quarters of the market, the overbuilder take-up needs to be 40% to cover the costs. BT and Virgin are highly unlikely to allow that to happen, so we think the CityFibre/ TalkTalk suburban build model will be too challenging. Hence we see less longer-term risk for BT and Virgin. But BT and Virgin need to be careful. As long as backers continue to fund these models, more infrastructure is put into the ground, and potentially the real winners from this could end up being the second generation of owners, as we saw with cable overbuild from the 1990s when it was rescued from bankruptcy. So, infrastructure can still be a good investment in the end, one just needs to get in at the right point in the cycle. (For all the details on these overbuilder economics, the full note is HERE).

For the full weekly review and updated comp sheets, see HERE.

Full 12-month historical recommendation changes are available on request

Reports produced by New Street Research LLP, 18th Floor, 100 Bishopsgate, London, EC2N 4AG. Tel: +44 20 7375 9111.

New Street Research LLP is authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority and is registered in the United States with the Securities and Exchange Commission as a foreign investment adviser.

Regulatory Disclosures: This research is directed only at persons classified as Professional Clients under the rules of the Financial Conduct Authority (‘FCA’), and must not be re-distributed to Retail Clients as defined in the rules of the FCA.

This research is for our clients only. It is based on current public information which we consider reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete, and it should not be relied on as such. We seek to update our research as appropriate, but various regulations may prevent us from doing so. Most of our reports are published at irregular intervals as appropriate in the analyst's judgment. This research is not an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation would be illegal. It does not constitute a personal recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual clients.

All our research reports are disseminated and available to all clients simultaneously through electronic publication to our website.

New Street Research LLC is neither a registered investment advisor nor a broker/dealer. Subscribers and/or readers are advised that the information contained in this report is not to be construed or relied upon as investment, tax planning, accounting and/or legal advice, nor is it to be construed in any way as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or any other form of investment. All opinions, analyses and information contained herein is based upon sources believed to be reliable and is written in good faith, but no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied, is made herein concerning any investment, tax, accounting and/or legal matter or the accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness and/or appropriateness of any of the information contained herein. Subscribers and/or readers are further advised that the Company does not necessarily update the information and/or opinions set forth in this and/or any subsequent version of this report. Readers are urged to consult with their own independent professional advisors with respect to any matter herein. All information contained herein and/or this website should be independently verified.

All research is issued under the regulatory oversight of New Street Research LLP.

Copyright © New Street Research LLP

No part of this material may be copied, photocopied or duplicated in any form by any means or redistributed without the prior written consent of New Street Research LLP.