Wholesaling isn't a dirty word

Wholesaling isn't a dirty word

Not many topics stir more fundamental debate within the sector than whether operators should voluntarily open up their networks to wholesale business or not. At New Street, we have ongoing debates between us in the office about whether operators really are better off doing it or not. There are so many variables at play: the opportunity of new high margin revenue streams - but what about the threat of losing retail customers, or causing damage to overall market pricing structure. Which one is bigger?

And we aren’t the only people debating this. In the past we believe this has been a hot topic at Vodafone, where the previous CEO, Vittorio Colao was a vocal advocate of not opening his networks up to wholesale business, unless done so at a suitably high rate. He also felt that by refusing access to MVNOs at low rates, this would lead to a behavioural change at the other MNOs and MVNOs might get shut out of the market, leading to broader market repair. Sadly, this turned out to be wishful thinking as other MNOs gladly saw more upside from our earlier equation. They didn’t see any incremental market damage and they picked up valuable high margin wholesale revenue from a competitor. Pure upside. As a sign of the controversy that this debate can cause, the new CEO now seems to be partially reversing this strategy and is now open to more wholesale opportunities. Better sweated assets should mean a better return for Vodafone, if retail markets don’t deteriorate as a result - see HERE for more details on this. In Europe, we certainly do think most of the retail damage has already been done.

This week, we explored HERE in this theme piece whether cable operators should now follow the MNOs and also offer their networks up to wholesale voluntarily. While for MNOs, we have always struggled with the angle that any network had clear differentiation which deserved a price premium and shouldn’t open itself up to competitors, this is more clear cut in cable where they clearly have network differentiation against the incumbents and have therefore been concerned about the potential damage to their retail franchise. At least for now.

With incumbents like BT and DT gradually beginning the upgrade path to FTTH, cable network speed is likely to become less of a differentiator. Furthermore, with sector ROCEs low and therefore less pressure likely from market wide retail broadband price cuts, the equation for a cable operator can now look more favourable - especially if they set the wholesale rate appropriately. Take Virgin Media - their current ARPU is £51 and we estimate their incremental cash conversion per average subscriber might be c.45% implying incremental cash profits of c.£22/ month. We assumed Virgin could offer a wholesale product at c.£20/ month, slightly undercutting BT’s rate to unbundlers and over a far wider area. So if all Virgin’s customers migrate over to wholesale, they would lose out (but not by much) – but then more importantly, if some of the other resellers can use their different brand messages to bring customers over to Virgin, it doesn’t take many migrations across before the model can be nicely profitable. We assumed 15% of the available competitor subscribers could migrate over, and Liberty can add 10% to their current equity value. Not bad for sweating the asset more aggressively. Vodafone should be able to achieve the same in Germany – so offers to United Internet and Sky could follow on from their initial offer to O2D.

This is all about voluntarily opening up the network. Where investors really have shown concern is when there is regulatory intervention – however, even this concern can often be overblown. As we saw in the US back in 2016 (see HERE), investors were concerned about cable networks being forced open by Democrat lawmakers, and there were similar concerns in Belgium that cost-plus regulation could lead to aggressive cuts in wholesale rates (see HERE). However, peak fear on these issues also proved to be greater buying opportunities. So, although forced wholesale can still bring with it risks – even those might be overstated, and where it is done voluntarily, assuming the appropriate rate is set, we believe European cable wholesale is something than investors should no longer shy away from.

Full 12-month historical recommendation changes are available on request

Reports produced by New Street Research LLP, 18th Floor, 100 Bishopsgate, London, EC2N 4AG. Tel: +44 20 7375 9111.

New Street Research LLP is authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority and is registered in the United States with the Securities and Exchange Commission as a foreign investment adviser.

Regulatory Disclosures: This research is directed only at persons classified as Professional Clients under the rules of the Financial Conduct Authority (‘FCA’), and must not be re-distributed to Retail Clients as defined in the rules of the FCA.

This research is for our clients only. It is based on current public information which we consider reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete, and it should not be relied on as such. We seek to update our research as appropriate, but various regulations may prevent us from doing so. Most of our reports are published at irregular intervals as appropriate in the analyst's judgment. This research is not an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation would be illegal. It does not constitute a personal recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual clients.

All our research reports are disseminated and available to all clients simultaneously through electronic publication to our website.

New Street Research LLC is neither a registered investment advisor nor a broker/dealer. Subscribers and/or readers are advised that the information contained in this report is not to be construed or relied upon as investment, tax planning, accounting and/or legal advice, nor is it to be construed in any way as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or any other form of investment. All opinions, analyses and information contained herein is based upon sources believed to be reliable and is written in good faith, but no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied, is made herein concerning any investment, tax, accounting and/or legal matter or the accuracy, completeness, correctness, timeliness and/or appropriateness of any of the information contained herein. Subscribers and/or readers are further advised that the Company does not necessarily update the information and/or opinions set forth in this and/or any subsequent version of this report. Readers are urged to consult with their own independent professional advisors with respect to any matter herein. All information contained herein and/or this website should be independently verified.

All research is issued under the regulatory oversight of New Street Research LLP.

Copyright © New Street Research LLP

No part of this material may be copied, photocopied or duplicated in any form by any means or redistributed without the prior written consent of New Street Research LLP.